Archived Story

Walgreens approved

Published 11:27pm Friday, December 21, 2012

City Council gave its unanimous approval to a new pharmacy in downtown Wednesday night, but the affirmation came without a piece of the project the company considered crucial.

The proposed Walgreens near the intersection of North Main Street and Constance Road will not be able to have an exit onto North Main, the City Council decided. The project will be allowed to have an entrance only there, while both entrance and exit will be allowed on West Constance Road.

According to developers CRES-EG Development LLC, the pharmacy insisted upon having an exit onto North Main Street and would not build without it.

But city officials were just as adamant that an exit onto North Main would create the potential for more crashes at one of the city’s busiest intersections.

In an unusual move, city traffic engineer Robert Lewis and Police Chief Thomas Bennett spoke at length before the public hearing after the usual presentation by Planning Director Scott Mills. All three urged the council not to allow the exit.

“We do not recommend allowing any changes that have a high potential to further degrade the capacity of an already overstressed corridor or increase the crash rates,” Lewis said.

He said the city had recorded 81 “reported” accidents at the intersection from 2009 to 2012. That number excludes those did not result in injury or property damage greater than $1,500.

A proposal born in the Planning Commission to limit exit only during congested hours did not win support with Bennett.

“The police department does not believe that’s feasible,” he said. “There are going to be a lot of people that totally disregard the signs. They do it all over the city.”

Carroll Collins of Kimley-Horn and Associates, a design consulting firm working for the developer, said the statements did not reflect “what’s going on in the real world.”

He argued drivers would not attempt to exit onto North Main during congested hours.

“The driver understands that’s not a safe move,” he said.

Council members, however, agreed with city staff, with some even drawing on personal experiences with traffic at the intersection to help them come to a decision.

“I think it’s already hazardous, and I think it would just make it worse,” said Mayor Linda T. Johnson, recalling several close calls she’s been involved in. “It’s much easier to come out on Constance.”

“This is a very good project, and we definitely need the revenues,” Vice Mayor Charles Brown said. But, he added, “You cannot go against safety.”

A motion to table the vote failed because, as Councilman Gardy put it, an additional month “is not going to accomplish one thing.”

A unanimous vote approved the drugstore with an entrance only on North Main. It was not clear by Friday whether Walgreens would still build the store.

  • Sea

    I wonder how people are going to turn left onto Constance without a traffic light. Turning left out of McDonald’s is not easy.

    Several years ago, I was traveling south on main and a driver turned left onto Main to go north. Thank goodness, no other cars were around me otherwise there would have been a head-on collision.

    This whole plan is asinine.

    Suggest Removal

  • dollyb12

    Thanks to all for vetoing the exit onto Main! However, Constance Road is unsafe also without road improvements. I hope Walgreen’s packs up and goes elsewhere since the exit onto Main was not approved. Don’t care much for Walgreen’s Drugstore anyway. I think a Kroger’s would be great. Farm Fresh prices are too high, and so are Harris Teeter’s.

    Suggest Removal


    Oh wonderful….yet ANOTHER drugstore. Just what we need. Why I’m surprised it isn’t a mattress, cell phone or auto parts store. A family resturant would have been nice or a quality grocery store such as Harris Teetor or trader Joe’s….and not in that location. Another drugstore is not what Suffolk needed.

    Suggest Removal

    • Ashley

      I agree KNRMCO. We dont need anothe drug store. All you see in downtown Suffolk is basically minimum wage jobs or duplicates of the same job.

      Suggest Removal

Editor's Picks